N64 emulator mac zelda ocarina of time. Operating System: Mac OS X 10.10 or later. Machine: Apple Macbook. Memory (RAM): 1GB of RAM required. Click on below button to start Microsoft Office 2016 Download for Mac OS X. This is completely Tested and Working Latest Version Mac OS App of. Take a look at Office for Mac 2016 instead.Microsoft Office 2011 for Mac is the latest version of the famous Microsoft Office Suite redesigned to work seamlessly with Mac OS X.One of the most notable. View full description. [Please note this is a copy of a question I am also asking on StackOverflow. If I get an answer there I will post it here as an update] I work for a team that currently specializes in creating windows desktop (WPF) applications in C#/.NET that interwork with local user instances of Microsoft Excel via Office Interop. I am currently charged with specifying a new product but I’ve been told that the project will not go ahead unless the app can run on Mac as well as Windows – that is, we have to be able to produce a Mac version of the app that can install natively on OSX and interact with the object model of a user’s instance of Microsoft Excel for Mac. (Running the app in Parallels, Mono or Wine is not a solution because the spec for the app requires that the user machine is not modified in any way. We just have to assume the user has a licenced local copy of Excel running, and work with that which is what we have always done on Windows, where it works great). I think.NET Core is the answer but I can’t find anywhere where it says definitely that we can (or will be able to) access the Excel Object Library from C# when running.NET Core on Mac OSX with a local copy of Excel for Mac installed. Can anybody point me please to where this has been discussed already, or it not, tell me how I can go about finding out from Microsoft if this is in their roadmap for.NET Core? Hi TechiMe, Based on, it seems it would not support. I suggest you add comments on this blog to see whether it will be supported. Not sure which is the best way, I suggest you try personal support. Or, I suggest you try in github. Best Regards, Edward MSDN Community Support Please remember to click 'Mark as Answer' the responses that resolved your issue, and to click 'Unmark as Answer' if not. This can be beneficial to other community members reading this thread. If you have any compliments or complaints to MSDN Support, feel free to contact. Hi TechniMe, Excel for Mac has limited support for add-ins - there is partial VBA support but otherwise neither the COM object model nor the native Excel C API is supported. Microsoft is actively developing the JavaScript APIs that work across the various platforms, including the web-based version of Excel. The most official response to this issue is the comment from Office Developer Team to a: ' Our focus is on enabling cross-platform solutions using modern web extensions. We’d like for the add-ins and UDF to work across multiple platforms including browser in a seamless fashion with minimal developer effort to make it functional across all platforms. We think Web platform using JavaScript is the best way to achieve this goal.' This means for integrating with Excel for Mac, you have two choices: Find a way to interact with a VBA add-in, or somehow use the JavaScript API. I think you will find both options very frustrating. Nothing else related to COM or.NET is on the horizon. I would suggest you reconsider whether support for Excel on Mac is really a requirement, and perhaps do some market research. In my experience, 'real' Excel users use the 'real' Excel (i.e. The desktop version on Windows). Two public channels for making suggestions are: * * Looking around there will give you some idea of the plans and responsiveness of the development teams. -Govert - Free and easy.NET for Excel. Thanks to Edward and Govert for their answers on this. I have been following up with Microsoft in the ways that Edward suggested but this is only reinforcing the general conclusion of these posts, which is that Microsoft's attention is now 100% focussed on Office Addins. Which are a great solution for web-driven data objects but doesn't begin to take the place of COM manipulation for work on the spreadsheet itself. I think Govert's right that there's a trend for 'real' Excel users to use the 'real' Excel', which in my experience often includes using Excel for Windows on Parallels on OSX, the main motivation for which is that the Mac version of Excel is usually 2-3 years behind the Windows version. However, Mac's share has been steadily growing and Mac Excel has been getting better so, whilst we could try and ignore the issue before, that's getting difficult now, in my opinion. Wiki says that 11% of all laptop web accesses (one way of measuring real market penetration) are from OSX, but Mac's share in Europe is higher than the world in general so it may be as high as 1 in 5 that side of the pond. It's a big ask to tell all those Mac users to go out and buy Parallels and a second copy of Excel in order to use your solution. Unfortunately I think that's where we are and will remain, for any integrators for whom VBA or Javascript access doesn't hack it. The very welcome.NET Core initiative looked like it was a fix, but sadly isn't.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |